The Church rejects the notion that Christ will visibly reign on earth for 1,000 years following His Second Coming. Maria Divine Mercy actively promotes this idea. |
The term "millenarianism" generally refers to the idea that, at his Second Coming, Jesus Christ will establish a visible kingdom on earth in which he will physically reign during a golden age of peace and prosperity for 1,000 years, at the end of which will occur the final judgment. This idea was rejected by the Church in 1824, when the Holy Office (the former name for the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) condemned a book by a Chilean priest which promoted millenarianism. Later, in 1944, the Holy Office issued a decree in which it stated that "the system of mitigated millenarianism cannot be taught safely taught" (see Denzinger-Schonmetzer 3839 [Denzinger 2296 in the "old numbering"]). (In the same decree, the Holy Office identified "mitigated millenarianism" as the idea "that Christ the Lord before the final judgment, whether or not preceded by the resurrection of the many just, will come visibly to rule over this world.") And, most recently, the Church reaffirmed this condemnation of millenarianism in the Catechism of the Catholic Church: "The Church has rejected even modified forms of this falsification of the kingdom to come under the name of millenarianism." (n. 676)
One of the reasons why the Church rejects millenarianism is because the idea contradicts what the Church professes in the Nicene Creed: "He will come in glory again to judge the living and the dead, and his kingdom will have no end." Jesus' Second Coming, the resurrection of the just, and the final judgment (which includes the final battle with Satan) will all take place at once and instantaneously: "in the twinkling of an eye" (1 Cor. 15:52), as St. Paul puts it (see Matthew 24:29-31; 1 Corinthians 15:20-24, 51-53; 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17, 2 Thessalonians 2:1-10; Catechism of the Catholic Church 668-677). Since the Second Coming and the final judgment will happen at the same time, a 1,000-year, visible reign of Christ on earth cannot be foreseen as taking place in between the two occurrences. And, once the Second Coming, the resurrection of the just, and the final judgment have transpired, there will follow the establishment of that kingdom which will have no end, as we profess, not of that on earth for 1,000 years.
So, when the Book of Revelation speaks of the 1,000-year reign of Christ in Revelation 20:4-6, only an interpretation which takes the 1,000-year time period as being symbolic would coincide with the Church's position on the matter. One such interpretation, as St. Augustine put forward, suggests that the 1,000-year reign represents the entire stretch of history spanning between Christ's First and Second Comings, during which time he reigns spiritually and sacramentally through his Church (see City of God, Book 20, Chapter 9).
Maria Divine Mercy actively promotes millenarianism. Following are several quotations in which she has promoted the idea of an actual, 1,000-year time period during which Christ is to reign on earth following his Second Coming:
"Many people believe that My Second Coming indicates that the end of the world has come. That is not the case, for instead, it will mean the end times when Satan and his followers, who create untold misery in the world, will be banished for 1,000 years." (May 20, 2011)
"The New Paradise on Earth is now being planned for all of My children. It will last 1,000 years on Earth and no one must be excluded, for that would break my Heart." (June 25, 2011, bold print in original)
"John the Evangelist was also told about the Glorious Return of My beloved Son, when he will reign in the new Era of Peace for 1,000 years." (February 23,2012)
"My chosen generation will be with Me for eternity. This Paradise will offer 1,000 years of peace, love, and harmony. After this period the second resurrection of the dead will take place." (February 24, 2012, bold print in original)
"You will live in love, peace and harmony during my Glorious Reign on earth for 1000 years." (April 6, 2012)
"The Era of Peace will take place after the Second Coming of My Son and will last 1,000 years." (April 9, 2012)
(See also August 14, 2011; February 14, 2012; April 29, 2012; June 9, 2012; June 21, 2012; October 15, 2012)
And, Maria Divine Mercy makes it clear that this "1,000 years" is not symbolic for some other time period. She assures us:
"Know that the 1,000 years referred to in the Book of Revelation means just that. If it was meant to be something different then it would have been given a different time. My Church, the Catholic Church, has not declared their beliefs because they have not done this yet." (May 28, 2012).
Such a literal understanding of the 1,000 years does not correspond with the Church's position on the matter. And, it is false to suggest that the "Church, the Catholic Church, has not declared their beliefs because they have not done this yet". As shown above, the Church has indeed spoken on the matter, and the fact that Maria Divine Mercy knows this is shown in further messages:
"Why do you deny, for example, the existence of the 1,000 years of the New Heaven and Earth?
This revelation is very specific and the truth is there for all to see.
Yet My Holy Word is challenged.
The Book of Revelation, just as the prophecies contained in the Book of Daniel, have been given to you only in parts. Many of you are confused." (March 22, 2012, bold print in original).
So, according to this message, anyone who "denies the existence of the 1,000 years of the New Heaven and Earth" is simply "confused". It is presumptuous for Maria Divine Mercy to imply that the Church has been merely "confused" all this time. And, regarding those of us who would continue to accept the Church's authority over Maria Divine Mercy's, Jesus supposedly told her:
"The prophecies, contained in the Book of Revelation, are only partially known.
No sacred servant in My Church understands the Book of Revelation, yet. They will be informed, and this I will do in parts. It is only for your knowing when I decide the time is right." (January 27, 2013, bold print in original)
And, regarding the leaders of the Church who continue to teach the Church's teaching, Jesus tells Maria Divine Mercy:
"You must not listen to those, within your ranks, who twist the Truth in relation to the New Era of Peace on Earth.
What motivates your brothers, within My Roman Catholic Church, who deny the Truth?
You have confused My children.
Because of their loyalty to the One True Church, The Roman Catholic Church, you are denying them the chance to prepare their souls for My Son’s Reign in the New Paradise on Earth." (February 23, 2012, bold print in original)
This message clearly conveys a call "not to listen to those, within [the] ranks" of the Church who put forward a different interpretation than Maria Divine Mercy's regarding the "New Era of Peace on Earth". And, faithful Catholics' "loyalty to the One True Church, The Roman Catholic Church" is presented as a stumbling block which hinders people from preparing "their souls for [Jesus'] Reign in the New Paradise on Earth". With these words, Maria Divine Mercy is advocating disloyalty to the Church, especially when the Church teaches something different than what she does.
What should be most telling in these messages is the implication that Maria Divine Mercy is aware that her messages convey a different teaching from the Church's, yet that she will continue to put forward this erroneous interpretation, anyway.
I just wanted to thank you for revealing the errors of Maria Divine Mercy.
ReplyDeleteGod Bless
Janet
these are not errors--anyone reading the Bible with the Holy Spirit will see this+<3--reminder: disciples of john in the earliest times agreed with this; the thousand years is indeed symbolic; the thousand years is as a day in the sight of the LORD represents "the day of the LORD," during which these things will be accomplished BEGINNING WITH HIS COMING AND THROUGH 1000 years EXACTLY AS REPRESENTED ONLY!!!
DeleteMary McGovern's message has become much more strident since she wrote:"You must not listen to those, within your ranks, who twist the Truth. . ."
ReplyDeleteNow it is a "crime against God" to refuse to listen to her because she is God's final prophet who, by the way, exclusively speaks the voice of Truth anywhere in the world. It is Mary McGovern and her followers who "need to be very careful" when they speak about the divinely appointed successors of the Apostles.
“Those who take it upon themselves to declare their superior knowledge of spiritual matters laid down by the Teachings of God, through the prophets, need to be very careful. When such souls declare their so-called knowledge, by boasting of their intellectual assessment of Holy Doctrine, instead of focusing on the importance of humility, THEY OFFEND ME. When they use their knowledge to TWIST THE TRUTH to suit their agenda, in order to draw souls into a MANMADE VERSION of MY TEACHINGS, I AM DEEPLY OFFENDED and I WILL PUNISH SOULS GUILTY OF THIS CRIME AGAINST GOD.” April 12, 2013
by the way, a prophet is not the one speaking, but THE LORD is speaking--who has knowledge of all things; do not be confused, yourself...+<3--
DeleteThe LORD has spoken through His Church which He still protects and guides. He has warned the faithful, around the world, through a succession of bishops, including the latest apostolic successor, Mary Carberry's own archbishop of Dublin, Diarmuid Martin. To refuse to recognize their God-given authority is to refuse to recognize the authority Jesus transferred to them. The authority He entrusted to them is the same authority He was given by God the Father. There is a line of succession of authority which predates Christianity. Anyone who understands, even a little, about God's plan of salvation as revealed in the Old Testament would know how much He frowns on all who rebel against authority.
Delete"Silk Again," read and reflect on the story of Moses and Aaron during the rebellion of Dathan and Abiram in Numbers 16. Only a very confused Catholic could possibly presume to think that his opinion trumps legitimate ecclesiastical authority. Only a very proud and presumptuous spirit could think such rebellion does not merit rebuke. Separate yourself from this charlatan and her denizens before it is too late. Have you no fear of God?
You must not listen to those, within your ranks, who twist the Truth in relation to the New Era of Peace on Earth.
ReplyDeleteWhat motivates your brothers, within My Roman Catholic Church, who deny the Truth?
You have confused My children.
Because of their loyalty to the One True Church, The Roman Catholic Church, you are denying them the chance to prepare their souls for My Son’s Reign in the New Paradise on Earth." (February 23, 2012, bold print in original)
This is the Magisterium today!
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/04/this-is-magisterium-today.html#links
Those who affirm the Truth are put down by the official Magisterium.
So you dont beleive in the book of revelation in the Holy Bible?
ReplyDeleteSo you dont beleive in the book of revelation in the Holy Bible? The 1000 years is in the Book of Revelation. Pls publish this dont be vias. Have mercy on all the people you are misleading.
ReplyDeleteTHE 1000 YEARS REIGHN IS CLEARLY STATED IN THE REVELATION.SO IF YOU REJECT THE 1`000 YEARS YOU REJECT THE BOOK OF REVELATION. BY REJECTING THE BOOK OF REVELATION YOU ARE SAFE TO ADD OR REMOVE WHATEVER YOU LIKE TO CHANGE BECAUSE IT IS IN THE BOOK OF REVELATION GOD WARNS THAT NO ONE SHOULD ADD OR REMOVE. I KNOW NOW WHY.
ReplyDeleteDONT BE BIAS PUBLISH MY COMMENT
ReplyDeleteTHE 1000 YEARS REIGHN IS CLEARLY STATED IN THE REVELATION.SO IF YOU REJECT THE 1`000 YEARS YOU REJECT THE BOOK OF REVELATION. BY REJECTING THE BOOK OF REVELATION YOU ARE SAFE TO ADD OR REMOVE WHATEVER YOU LIKE TO CHANGE BECAUSE IT IS IN THE BOOK OF REVELATION GOD WARNS THAT NO ONE SHOULD ADD OR REMOVE. I KNOW NOW WHY.
ReplyDeleteDear Paul,
DeleteIt is very reasonable to interpret the 1,000-year reign as being symbolic. The Book of Revelation is replete with symbolic, even paradoxical, language. For example, there is the lion who is a lamb, "standing as if slain" (5:5-6). There are the robes that are made white upon begin washed in blood (7:9, 13-14; 19:11, 13-14). Then, there's Jesus pulling a sword out of his mouth which is symbolic of his word (19:15). Given the presence of such symbolic language throughout the Book of Revelation, there is nothing there indicating that we must interpret the 1,000-year reign as being literal.
Pax Christi